Wednesday, July 1, 2009

NYPD Pays Settlement In Subway Search Case But Maintains Policy



In an agreement approved today by a federal judge, New York City will pay $25,000 to settle a lawsuit the New York Civil Liberties Union filed on behalf of a Brooklyn man who has been the repeated victim of racial profiling at NYPD subway bag search checkpoints. The city, however, rejected an offer to forgo all monetary relief in exchange for the NYPD making changes to the search program.

Jangir Sultan, a 32-year-old native New Yorker of Kashmiri descent, has been stopped and had his bag searched by police officers 21 times since the NYPD initiated the subway checkpoint program in 2005. In February, the NYCLU sued the city and Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly in federal court asserting that the persistent targeting by police officers violated Sultan’s rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

“The city should be working to prevent racial profiling, not paying damage settlements,” NYCLU Executive Director Donna Lieberman said. “Mr. Sultan twice offered to forgo all damages if the NYPD would agree to monitor and supervise subway checkpoints to ensure racial profiling does not occur. Unfortunately, the city rejected these offers.”

As part of the subway program, the NYPD places checkpoints at any given time in a tiny percent of the approximately 1,000 subway entrances throughout the city. Officers manning checkpoints ostensibly select passengers for bag searches on a numerical basis. The officers decide at the start of a checkpoint what fraction of passengers to search, for example every 25th person. The NYPD maintains that Sultan was stopped based on such a numerical formula. But the NYCLU says the likelihood that Sultan would be stopped 21 times from July 2005 to June 2008 on the basis of this numerical system is about one in 165 million. The NYCLU argued that Sultan’s South Asian appearance is the only factor that can explain this persistent targeting by police officers.

The NYPD explicitly forbids checkpoint officers from recording any demographic information about the people they select for searches. The NYCLU charged in its lawsuit, however, that this policy prohibits the NYPD from detecting or correcting racial profiling by officers.

Security and counter-terrorism consultant Gary Moskowitz doesn't believe the officers who stopped Sultan followed policy.

"I don't believe that for a second if he was stopped 21 times," said Moskowitz, a former NYPD officer.

"There is a public policy and there's a personal policy. Obviously he was stopped based on a personal policy."

Moskowitz says $25,000 is a small price to pay for being challenged for not following the official policy, which he believes is flawed. He says proper profiling can prevent terrorist attacks.

"Eventually when the bombs go off they are going to profile even more," he says.

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kenstein/42270793/

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Lets see. Who are the people that took down the WTC? What was their nationality? I have no problem with profiling. We dont do enough of it in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

Tell you what........... go against racial profiling after you have had a bomb go off in a subway and see how the general population feels.
Obviously in our twisted world political correctness is more important than people's lives! People who are stopped and allowed to leave obviously have nothing to worry about, surely this is a small price to pay for the safety of many? Or are is their minor inconvenience more important that the lives of many?