Friday, February 27, 2009

Obama Makes Good On Pledge To Try Terrorist Suspects In Criminal Court


Al-Marri

A man suspected of providing material support to al Qaeda has been transferred from military to civilian custody and charged in a two-count indictment.

President Obama had ordered a review of the status of Ali Saleh Kahlah al-Marri leading to him being charged by the Justice Department.

Al-Marri, 43, is charged in a federal grand jury indictment that was unsealed today with providing material support to al Qaeda and conspiring with others to provide material support to the terrorist organization. If convicted, al-Marri, a dual national of Saudi Arabia and Qatar could be sentenced to 30 years in prison.

“This indictment shows our resolve to protect the American people and prosecute alleged terrorists to the full extent of the law,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “In this administration, we will hold accountable anyone who attempts to do harm to Americans and we will do so in a manner consistent with our values.”

On January 22, 2009, Obama ordered Holder to lead an inter agency review of the case against al-Marri, who was being held by the military. After the indictment was issued, the president ordered that al-Marri be transferred from the Naval Consolidated Brig in Charleston, South Carolina to the custody of the Justice Department to face criminal prosecution. President Bush had ordered al-Marri detained as an enemy combatant.

The change is a significant one because it brings into the open the treatment and prosecution of those charged with acts of terrorism or support of terrorism. Something Obama pledged to do during the campaign.

This is good news for the American people and those around the world who have been critical of the way the United States has, in the past, treated prisoners. It also assures those charged that they will enjoy a fair trial in the U.S. system of jurisprudence.

Some people fear that information that could be damaging to national security might be made public during trials in civilian criminal courts. But judges have the discretion to keep such critical information out of open court.

More importantly, the public will be educated about the threat that terrorists pose to the United States homeland. It's important that we remain vigilant against the possibility of terrorism and supportive of efforts to prevent additional terrorist attacks both in the United States and abroad.

Al-Marri entered the United States on September 10, 2001, purportedly to pursue a second bachelor’s degree at Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois. He was held as a material witness in the investigation of the September 11, 2001 attacks. He was then indicted in by a grand jury on charges of credit card fraud, false statements and identity fraud. But in June, 2003, President Bush declared him an enemy combatant and he was transferred to the Naval Brig where he has been detained since.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com


When A Withdrawal Isn't


Coming home?

President Obama's announcement today that he's pulling troops from Iraq by September of next year seems like the satisfaction of a campaign promise. But a closer look shows that's not exactly true.

First, he had promised during the campaign to get the troops three months sooner. For another, he's still leaving up to 50,000 troops in country until the end of 2011.

So it's really not a withdrawal as advertised. It's only a reduction.

Some will argue that he's pulling "combat troops" out and that those remaining will perform other functions. Nonsense.

First, the term combat troops is redundant. Whether actively engaged or not, all troops are combat troops.

Second, this is not like the troop deployment in, for example, Germany. Iraq remains a dangerous place for everyone, including U.S. troops.

The reduction of troops is a refreshing move in the right direction. But let's not start throwing ticker tape parades for Johnny coming marching home quite yet. That will have to wait 'til New Year's Day, 2012.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com




Thursday, February 26, 2009

Obama Budget = $1 Trillion Tax Hike



Yesterday during News Talk Online on Paltalk.com I asked the question, "where is the money going to come from to pay for President Obama's economic recovery package?"

Several callers suggested that it will come in the form of a tax hike. But my response then was, in essence, he's not called for a tax hike for anyone making under $250,000-a-year. In fact, as of April 1, those individuals should see, the president says, larger paychecks because federal taxes are being reduced.

But today, during his budget address, the president proposed nearly $1 trillion in taxes.

Of course, if you're going to reduced taxes for most of us, increase spending and cut the federal deficit of $1.3 trillion in half in four years, you have to get the money from somewhere.

This means a fundamental switch in how taxes are collected in the United States. Poor and middle income families will see a reduction in their tax obligation. But 2.6 million of the richest Americans will pay a greater proportion.

Since most of us are unaffected by this, why should we care? Because Americans believe in the concept of fairness. So, as unpopular as this may seem, I, who by way of disclosure stand to benefit not lose by this plan, am going to cry "foul."

This is not to say that the burden should be placed on the poor either. It should be evenly distributed.

In my mind, there's only one way to do this: eliminate the federal income tax.

I say, get rid of the income tax with its loop holes and tax shelters and disproportionate burdens. And replace it with a federal sales tax.

Here's what will happen if we do that.

People will come home with fatter paychecks. If you have a $50,000-a-year-job you'll take home close to that. Of course there will have to be other withholdings, perhaps for Social Security, state income taxes and the like. But in the main, those who are employed will know how much they are actually making.

If you have more money in your pocket you have more money to spend as well. If you spend money, that money will be taxed. The federal government won't suffer. In fact, this plan has the potential of raising a lot more money for the feds than the income tax.

But that's not all.

All those tourists who are coming here to enjoy the United States (and we welcome them with open arms!) and who are spending so much money because their currency is strong against the dollar right now will be contributing to the funding of the infrastructure they are benefiting from during their visits.

But, as the late night TV pitch man might say, there's even more!

All those illegal immigrants who are, advocates argue, draining public resources but not contributing, will in fact be paying their fair share as well.

Every time they go to a McDonald's to buy their one nutritious meal of the day, they will be charged a federal sales tax. You've heard about pay to play programs? We can call this one pay to stay.

By the way, for those of you who think this plan lets the rich off the hook - it doesn't. People who have more money spend more money. If they spend more money they will be contributing more to the federal monetary stockpiles.

Finally, it takes the federal government out of the business of being punitive toward its own citizens over an income tax whose regulations are impossible, even for the IRS, to follow.

I have no problem with pumping money into the economy to stimulate it. And I agree with reducing the federal deficit. Now let's find a way to share this burden equally among all of us, citizens or not, who live and work or visit this great nation.

We'll talk about Obama's proposed budget and my vision of a fair tax structure at 5 PM New York time today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com. CLICK HERE to join in the conversation.

Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users.

News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to an additional 12 million households.




How Transparency Could Lead To Political Interference


Grassley

The government has set up a Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board designed to ensure that the hundreds of billions of dollars set out in President Obama's economic recovery packages are properly misspent and that there are no wasteful expenditures.

But one U.S. senator, long a champion of fiscal oversight of government projects, warns that in the wrong hands the RAT board, as it is called, could abuse its power.

There is a section in the legislation, largely overlooked during the debate, which permits the RAT board to direct the inspector generals of the various federal agencies to investigate certain allegations of fiscal misappropriation. Or to actually halt investigations.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) says this is where he has concerns.

Grassley's press secretary, Beth Pellett Levine, says while the senator has "the greatest respect" for Earl Devaney, a former Secret Service agent who heads the effort, the provision that gives the RAT board the authority to order investigations and even order them stopped, leads to the possibility of political interference and abuse. Grassley is concerned that the independence the various inspector generals need to do their jobs could be compromised.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Paying For Obama's Agenda Topic On Paltalk

The means of paying for President Obama's vision for economic recovery, better educational opportunities, improved health care and more ecologically friendly energy alternatives was the topic of discussion on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com today.

Among the callers addressing the issue:

Cassandra in the United Kingdom, who said, Obama's speech outlining his economic agenda was one that "appeals to the emotions." But that doesn't explain where the money is coming from. "Emotions alone," she said, "don't hack it."

Jann in California fears all that Obama wants to do will mean thinner paychecks for all. "They're going to do the same they just did here in California," she predicted. "They are going to raise taxes."

And Sammy in Illinois expressed concern that Obama's vision will change what the United States stands for. "We've never lived in the United States," he opined, "with a more socialist agenda."




Yet Another Alleged Investment Fraud Scheme

Two New York investment managers have been arrested on charges that they bulked customers out of hundreds of millions of dollars.

Federal prosecutors identify the duo as Paul Greenwood, 61, of North Salem, NY and Stephen Walsh, 64, of Sands Point, NY. They were arrested this morning on conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud charges.

A three-count complaint unsealed today in Manhattan federal court charges that from at least 1996 through February 2009, Greenwood and Walsh ran a fraudulent commodities trading and investment advisory scheme using an entity they controlled called WG Trading Investors. Through a marketer, Greenwood and Walsh allegedly solicited investor funds on the understanding that they would invest the money in a program called “enhanced stock indexing,” which they represented was a conservative trading strategy that had outperformed the results of the S&P 500 Index for more than 10 years.

Several institutional investors – including charitable and university foundations, retirement and pension plans and others – invested more than $668 million through WG Trading Investors, receiving in exchange promissory notes that, it is charged, the defendants represented would pay interest at a rate equal to the investment returns earned by the enhanced stock indexing strategy.

Greenwood and Walsh are alleged to have misappropriated the majority of the investor funds. Among other things, Greenwood is alleged to have used the funds to purchase expensive collectible items and horses, as well as for other personal expenditures. Walsh is alleged to have misappropriated investor funds for himself, and to have made large cash payments to his ex-wife.

Prosecutors say the promissory notes totaled approximately $293 million for Greenwood and approximately $261 million for Walsh.

An audit of the company earlier this month by the National Futures Association concluded that of approximately $812 million purportedly on the books of WG Investors, more than $794 million was booked as receivables due from Greenwood and Walsh. The two turned themselves into the FBI this morning. They are each charged with one count of conspiracy to commit securities fraud and wire fraud, one count of securities fraud and one count of wire fraud.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

First Time Home Buyers To Get Tax Credits

The Treasury Department is, today, releasing details of a plan to help first time home buyers get into a house by offering tax credits of up to $8,000.

"The expansion of the first-time home buyer tax break as part of the president's recovery agenda gives money to taxpayers when they need it most, while also targeting an important group of buyers," said Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner.

"We view our economic recovery plan, our financial stability plan and now this homeowner affordability plan as three legs of the same stool – an integrated whole that represents our immediate response to the current crisis. We remain committed to swift, efficient and effective implementation of all of these components."

The announcement comes on the heels of the first Recovery Plan Implementation meeting led by Vice President Joe Biden at the White House this morning. Biden is overseeing the administration's implementation of the Recovery Act's provisions.

You can apply for the credit by going to the IRS website and fill out a revised version of Form 5405. Qualifying taxpayers who buy a home this year before December 1 can claim up to $8,000, or $4,000 for married individuals filing separately, on either their 2008 or 2009 tax returns. Unlike the prior first-time homebuyer credit, this is money individuals do not need to pay back.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Economy Threat To National Security


Blair


The economic crisis is affecting national security as well because it evokes fears of "instability and high levels of violent extremism" as was seen in Europe in the 1920's and '30's.

That assessment comes from Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair in the public portion of his testimony today to the House Intelligence Committee.

Blair says the longer the global economic downturn continues the more serious the threat to U.S. strategic interests.

"Roughly a quarter of the countries in the world have already experienced low-level instability such as government changes because of the current slowdown," Blair says.

He points to anti-state demonstrations in Europe and the former Soviet Union as evidence. And notes that much of Latin America, the former Soviet states and sub-Saharan Africa lack sufficient cash reserves, access to international aid or credit.

"Statistical modeling shows that economic crises increase the risk of regime-threatening instability if they persist over a one to two year period," Blair says.

"Besides increased economic nationalism, the most likely political fallout for U.S. interests will involve allies and friends not being able to fully meet their defense and humanitarian obligations."

Blair envisions a potential flood of refugees from Caribbean countries to the United States.

He also sounds a cautionary tone about how lower oil prices - good news for consumers - puts additional pressures on Iran and Venezuela to engage in what the director calls "adventurism."

Blair's testimony also focuses on extremist groups that use terrorism. To no one's surprise, he identifies extremist Muslim groups as presenting the greatest capability to threaten the United States.

The good news, he says, is that these groups have been unsuccessful in meeting their goal of conducting another major attack in the United States. And he notes that mainstream Muslim opinion is turning against groups like al-Qaeda.

"Over the last year and a half, al-Qaeda has faced significant public criticism from prominent religious leaders and fellow extremists primarily regarding the use of brutal and indiscriminate tactics." Blair cites actions taken by al-Qaeda in Iraq, and elsewhere, that have claimed the lives of Islamic civilians for helping weaken support from Muslims.

But he also notes that al-Qaeda has been changing tactics, throwing more support toward the Taliban and moving the battleground to Afghanistan and Pakistan. The squeeze the U.S. and its allies have put on al-Qaeda in that region, he says, has made the terrorist organization "less capable and effective than it was a year ago."

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Excerpts From Obama's Speech




Here are excerpts from President Obama's speech about his vision for economic recovery for the nation before a joint session of Congress. A speech that was carried live on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com


While our economy may be weakened and our confidence shaken; though we are living through difficult and uncertain times, tonight I want every American to know this: We will rebuild, we will recover, and the United States of America will emerge stronger than before.

"The weight of this crisis will not determine the destiny of this nation. The answers to our problems don’t lie beyond our reach. They exist in our laboratories and universities; in our fields and our factories; in the imaginations of our entrepreneurs and the pride of the hardest-working people on Earth. Those qualities that have made America the greatest force of progress and prosperity in human history we still possess in ample measure. What is required now is for this country to pull together, confront boldly the challenges we face, and take responsibility for our future once more.


We have lived through an era where too often, short-term gains were prized over long-term prosperity; where we failed to look beyond the next payment, the next quarter, or the next election. A surplus became an excuse to transfer wealth to the wealthy instead of an opportunity to invest in our future. Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.

Well that day of reckoning has arrived, and the time to take charge of our future is here.

Now is the time to act boldly and wisely – to not only revive this economy, but to build a new foundation for lasting prosperity. Now is the time to jumpstart job creation, re-start lending, and invest in areas like energy, health care, and education that will grow our economy, even as we make hard choices to bring our deficit down. That is what my economic agenda is designed to do, and that’s what I’d like to talk to you about tonight.




The recovery plan and the financial stability plan are the immediate steps we’re taking to revive our economy in the short-term. But the only way to fully restore America’s economic strength is to make the long-term investments that will lead to new jobs, new industries, and a renewed ability to compete with the rest of the world. The only way this century will be another American century is if we confront at last the price of our dependence on oil and the high cost of health care; the schools that aren’t preparing our children and the mountain of debt they stand to inherit. That is our responsibility.

In the next few days, I will submit a budget to Congress. So often, we have come to view these documents as simply numbers on a page or laundry lists of programs. I see this document differently. I see it as a vision for America – as a blueprint for our future.

My budget does not attempt to solve every problem or address every issue. It reflects the stark reality of what we’ve inherited – a trillion dollar deficit, a financial crisis, and a costly recession.

Given these realities, everyone in this chamber – Democrats and Republicans – will have to sacrifice some worthy priorities for which there are no dollars. And that includes me.

But that does not mean we can afford to ignore our long-term challenges. I reject the view that says our problems will simply take care of themselves; that says government has no role in laying the foundation for our common prosperity.




Yesterday, I held a fiscal summit where I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. My administration has also begun to go line by line through the federal budget in order to eliminate wasteful and ineffective programs. As you can imagine, this is a process that will take some time. But we’re starting with the biggest lines. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade.

In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud, and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.




I know that we haven’t agreed on every issue thus far, and there are surely times in the future when we will part ways. But I also know that every American who is sitting here tonight loves this country and wants it to succeed. That must be the starting point for every debate we have in the coming months, and where we return after those debates are done. That is the foundation on which the American people expect us to build common ground.




But in my life, I have also learned that hope is found in unlikely places; that inspiration often comes not from those with the most power or celebrity, but from the dreams and aspirations of Americans who are anything but ordinary.

I think about Leonard Abess, the bank president from Miami who reportedly cashed out of his company, took a $60 million bonus, and gave it out to all 399 people who worked for him, plus another 72 who used to work for him. He didn’t tell anyone, but when the local newspaper found out, he simply said, ''I knew some of these people since I was 7 years old. I didn't feel right getting the money myself."

I think about Greensburg, Kansas, a town that was completely destroyed by a tornado, but is being rebuilt by its residents as a global example of how clean energy can power an entire community – how it can bring jobs and businesses to a place where piles of bricks and rubble once lay. "The tragedy was terrible," said one of the men who helped them rebuild. "But the folks here know that it also provided an incredible opportunity."

And I think about Ty’Sheoma Bethea, the young girl from that school I visited in Dillon, South Carolina – a place where the ceilings leak, the paint peels off the walls, and they have to stop teaching six times a day because the train barrels by their classroom. She has been told that her school is hopeless, but the other day after class she went to the public library and typed up a letter to the people sitting in this room. She even asked her principal for the money to buy a stamp. The letter asks us for help, and says, "We are just students trying to become lawyers, doctors, congressmen like yourself and one day president, so we can make a change to not just the state of South Carolina but also the world. We are not quitters.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com




Drug Shortage Spurs Malaria Fears In Africa Topic On Paltalk


Tren


A shortage of drugs is causing concern that malaria will spread in Kenya. There is also concern about a short supply of TB drugs in the African nation.

Kenyan health officials say the supply of drugs is expected to run out by September.

Malaria is the number one killer of children under the age of five in Kenya. In all, some 16,000 people die there from malaria each year.

At issue is a rift between the government and the Global Fund, which supplies funds for fighting AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, over the alleged mismanagement of donated money. The current Kenyan government is denying complicity in the misappropriation of money. To date, the Global Fund has committed nearly $15 billion in 140 nations to support large scale prevention, treatment and care programs against the three diseases.

Another problem is that researchers in the UK have discovered that mosquitoes have developed a resistance to pesticides that have been used against them.

Meanwhile, charities are seeing a decrease in the amount of donations due to a downturn in the economy. Enter the group Hedge Funds Against Malaria, founded by Lance Laifer, a hedge fund manager and a member of Paltalk's board of directors.

After learning that more than 1 million people die from malaria annually, Laifer organized experts on the disease in America and began a program that encourages hedge funds to donate money to help eradicate the problem.

Laifer, a previous guest on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com, has raised money to purchase bed netting, to protect children in malaria prone regions of Africa against disease-carrying mosquitoes.

More recently he has organized a group called One Million Faces Against Malaria on Facebook. The idea is to get 1 million people to join and add their photos to the group to demonstrate the number of people who die every year from this preventable disease.

Joining us on Tuesday March 3 on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com to discuss the ongoing fight against malaria is Richard Tren, director of Africa Fighting Malaria,
a non-profit health advocacy group founded in 2000 and based in South Africa and the United States and on whose board Laifer sits.

AFM's mission is to make malaria control more transparent, responsive and effective. the organization conducts research into the social and economic aspects of malaria and raise the profile of the disease and the issues surrounding its control in the local and international media.

AFM strives to hold public institutions accountable for funding and implementing effective, integrated and country-driven malaria control policies and to promote successful private sector initiatives to control the disease.

Tren has been AFM's director since its inception in 2000 and in 2006 was appointed as the chairman of the AFM board. Born in South Africa, Tren now works in AFM's Washington, DC office. He has published widely on the political economy of malaria control as well as on other topics of health care and development.

To talk to Tren on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 5 PM New York time Tuesday March 3 CLICK HERE.

Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users.

News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to an additional 12 million households.


Bernanke Testimony, Upcoming Obama Address, Topic On Paltalk

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke's testimony before the Senate Banking Committee this morning and President Obama's upcoming speech were discussed thoroughly on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com today.

Producer Boaz Frankel in California says he was happy to see members of the committee asking tough questions of Bernanke. "I'm glad to see the committee has used a policy of scrutiny," he said. But he says Bernanke's pronouncement that the recession could come to an end by the close of this year may be misleading. "This whole process may be creating a false sense," he said, of optimism. And he was disappointed that Bernanke couldn't say how much more money will be needed to stimulate the economy. "People," he said, "want to know numbers."

Political correspondent Alan Jasie in New York, however, thought Bernanke delivered exactly the right message. He believes the president should follow his lead. "Obama," he says, "needs to speak to the nation tonight ... (offering) some hope."

But Jeff in Tennessee fears Bernanke was sugar coating the reality. "I don't think we're in a recession," he said. "I think we are in the beginnings of a depression. We are losing more jobs than the government can create." Jeff believes the economic stimulus package is just delaying the inevitable, and that the American economy will have to completely collapse before something better can be built in its place.

Dari in Connecticut called Bernanke's predictions a "pep talk." She says we've been through less turbulent economic times and that it took much longer to get out of them. "The economic crisis of the '80's certainly wasn't as bad as today," she said, "and it took many years to get over that."

But Rachel in Louisiana says Bernanke's job today was an effort to calm and create a sense of security with investors. Obama should follow the Fed chairman's lead tonight. "If not," she says, "we could go into an economic and emotional depression."

Eric in Iowa, however couldn't believe how upbeat Bernanke was. "I was hoping at the end they would be playing 'Don't Worry, Be Happy,'" an appropriate theme song, Eric believes, for his appearance.










President Obama's Joint Session Of Congress Address Live On Paltalk



President Obama's first speech to a joint session of Congress will be carried live on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 9 PM New York time tonight.

The president, who has been outlining his economic recovery plan incessantly, is expected to brief Congress on full details.

His remarks follow testimony this morning by Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke to the Senate Banking Committee in which he said the recession could come to an end this year. That's presuming, Bernanke said, that Obama's economic stimulus plan works.

Bernanke's testimony was also carried live on News Talk Online.

Not only will he provide additional details of his economic recovery plan, but the president is expected to call for even more government intervention on the economy.

His remarks will be closely watched by the markets. The Dow was up following Bernanke's testimony.

We'll also be discussing Bernanke's testimony as well as the president's scheduled address tonight on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 5 PM New York time. CLICK HERE to join in the conversation.

Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users.

News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to an additional 12 million households.

Bernanke Shows Cautious Optimism About Recovery

In his opening statement to the Senate Banking Committee, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke expressed hope that there may be some economic recovery in the United States before the end of the year.

Bernanke's predictions are predicated upon President Obama's economic recovery plan working. But he says that if the president is successful, he projects that the "contraction" of the economy will continue through the first half of 2009. But, he says, there will be some recovery in the second half of the year and into 2010.

He says if all goes well, recession "will end in 2009." Full recovery, he says, would take 2-to-3 years.

But Bernanke did offer some cautionary notes.

"Downside risk," he said, "outweighs those on the upside."

Bernanke's testimony is being carried live on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

Bernanke touted the actions the Fed has taken so far to help obviate the economic crisis. Including the opening of new lending facilities and enacting measures to reduce what he called, "unnecessary foreclosures."

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Unstable Ukraine May Be Rejected By NATO, EU


Pifer

Ukraine's political infighting and tensions with Russia threaten its path to stability and integration with the West, warns a new report issued today by the Council on Foreign Relations.

"A more divided Ukraine would be less able to formulate a coherent foreign policy course with which the U.S. government could engage; it could even be driven to reorient itself on a more Moscow-focused course," says report author Steven Pifer, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center on the United States and Europe and former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine.

On the crucial NATO question, the report, Averting Crisis in Ukraine, urges the United States to support continued Ukrainian integration with NATO. But it also recommends waiting to back concrete steps toward membership until the nation is more stable.

Pifer cites the Ukraine's fractious politics, a deeply divided public opinion and economic recession. He also examines Russia's increasingly assertive foreign policy—including issues related to the continued presence and eventual withdrawal of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, Ukrainian and European dependence on Russia's energy.

"The Kremlin believes that an unstable Ukraine is in its interest. Such instability makes Ukraine an unattractive political model for Russians as well as an unattractive candidate for NATO or the European Union," says Pifer.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Monday, February 23, 2009

Bernanke Testimony Live On Paltalk


Bernanke


One of the most closely watched events in Washington Tuesday will be Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke's semi-annual appearance before the Senate Banking Committee. His comments about the state of the U.S. economy will be carried live on a special edition of News Talk Online on Paltalk.com starting at 10 AM New York time.

The markets will be watching and listening closely as Bernanke is expected to calm fears about the effects of the economic downturn with words of reassurance. He's expected to predict a return to growth in the economy next year. But that doesn't necessarily translate into an anticipation that there will be many new jobs.

The issue of nationalization of the nation's banks may also come up during his testimony. Last week, committee chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) suggested a short-term nationalization of banks, something the Obama administration opposes.

Bernanke will be questioned about how the Fed is addressing the issue of a credit-starved economy and what it is doing to make it possible for financial institutions to start lending money again.

To watch the Bernanke testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 10 AM New York time Tuesday February 24 CLICK HERE.

Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users.

News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to an additional 12 million households.

Obama's Plan To Stimulate The Economy And Cut The Deficit Debated On Paltalk

Is it even possible to spend billions of dollars on a stimulus package, even more on bailout plans and still cut the $1.3 trillion federal deficit in half in four years?

That's what President Obama is suggesting. And that's the question we asked, and discussed, today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

Boaz in California doesn't think it's possible.

But Jim in Michigan says the stimulus package had to pass. "If we don't create jobs, if we don't create a good housing marked we can't get out of this crisis," he argues.

Silvia in Argentina agrees. She says the stimulus money will find its way into the private sector, and the private sector, she says, will lead the nation, and the world, out of the economic downturn. More jobs, she says, will be created. More taxes will be collected. "In the long term," she says, the government "will receive that money back."

But Leah in Texas says the Obama plan ignores the lessons of economics 101. She says, eventually, "they are going to have to raise taxes somewhere."

Scott in Canada says you can stimulate the economy and reduce the deficit. He argues that Obama plans on cutting back the cost of the war in Iraq. And is insisting that future projects include funding components.

Erik in Iowa says bailouts just don't help an economy recover. He argues that when Japan went through it's last recession "they tried to bail the banks out seven times and it failed."

Lynda in Illinois questions the selection of projects for the stimulus package. "The government," she argues, "is wasting ... money" on programs like building day care centers. Instead, she says, the money should be applied to reducing the nation's debt.

But Malik in Indianapolis hopes the president's gamble will work. "He wants to stimulate the foundation of the economy," he says. "The option of doing nothing wasn't good."




Call For Reappointment Of 9/11 Health Czar


Howard

Two members of Congress and other interested parties gathered at Ground Zero this morning to call for the reappointment of a 9/11 health czar to coordinate health care from those who remain ill from their exposure to the toxins emitted when the Twin Towers came down during the 2001 terrorist attacks.

The members of Congress, Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) were joined by New York state AFL-CIO president Denis Hughes, 9/11 first responders and residents of lower Manhattan to publicly ask President Obama to reappoint Dr. John Howard to the post.

Howard, then the director of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, was put in charge of federal 9/11 health programs in February 2006 by Michael Leavitt, then Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. But in July 2008, Howard was let go from both positions with little explanation and despite widespread praise of his job performance.

“The Bush administration made a good decision in appointing Dr. Howard and a typically bad move in letting him go," Maloney said.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

FBI Rescues 48 Children Forced Into Prostitution


Mueller

The FBI announced today that, along with local law enforcement agencies, 48 children who were forced into prostitution were recovered during a national sweep dubbed Operation Cross Country III.

In addition to recovering the children, agents and cops in 29 cities arrested 571 suspects on a combination of state and federal charges for the domestic trafficking of children for prostitution and solicitation.

“We continue to pursue those who exploit our nation's children,” said FBI Director Robert Mueller.

“We may not be able to return their innocence but we can remove them from this cycle of abuse and violence.”

Since the Innocence Lost National Initiative was launched in 2003 670 children have been recovered across the United States. Prosecutions have resulted in lengthy prison terms including multiple 25-years-to-life sentences and the seizure of more than $3 million in assets.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Recession Could End By Year's End



Varvares


In the most optimistic prediction of the resolution of the economic crisis to date, the National Association for Business Economics says the recession will end in the second half of 2009 and there will be substantial growth in the economy next year.

The NABE cautions, however, that meaningful recovery won't be evident until next year. Still, that's a much better outlook than any other that's being offered.

Things will, however, get worse, says the NABE, before they get better.

"Further pronounced weakening in housing and deteriorating labor markets underscore the risks for 2009,” said NABE President Chris Varvares.

Varvares, president of Macroeconomic Advisers says that it's expected that there will be a sharp, 5 percent contraction in the economy the first quarter of 2009. Followed by a decline of a 1.7 percent in the second quarter. But Varvares says NABE forecasters expect real GDP to rise at a sub-par 1.6% rate in the second half.

He says this leaves a decline of .9 percent overall in 2009, on the heels of a .2% decline in 2008.

Although the unemployment rate is forecast to rise to 9 percent by year-end, "the good news," Varvares says, is that "economic activity is expected to turn up in the second half of the year and 2010 is expected to see modestly above-trend growth of 3.1 percent.”

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

New Steps To Help The Banking Industry



As President Obama prepares to meet with members of Congress and officials of financial institutions to further discuss, today, his economic bailout plan, the latest government step to further support the banking industry is being revealed.

The Treasury Department will seek ways to reduce regulations on the banking industry in the hopes that more credit will be extended to borrowers in order to stimulate the economy.

The idea, according to Treasury, is to find ways to reduce the financial strain on the banks to make it easier for them to offer credit.

According to a joint statement issued this morning by Treasury, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision and the Federal Reserve Board the steps are being taken to ensure that the nation enjoys "a strong, resilient financial system."

"The U.S. government stands firmly behind the banking system during this period of financial strain to ensure it will be able to perform its key function of providing credit to households and businesses," the statement says.

"The government will ensure that banks have the capital and liquidity they need to provide the credit necessary to restore economic growth. Moreover, we reiterate our determination to preserve the viability of systemically important financial institutions so that they are able to meet their commitments."

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Sunday, February 22, 2009

U.S. More Socialist Than Russia?




A comment about socialism made by Russian President Vladamir Putin at the recent opening session of the economic summit at Davos escaped me but was just today brought to my attention by a friend.
Putin warned the United States to learn from the lessons of his nation and avoid what he termed, "excessive intervention in economic activity and blind faith in the state’s omnipotence.” Prompting the following essay from contributor Wayne Boesch.

By Wayne Boesch


This is what I totally dislike about liberal ''messiahs" like Al Gore and Barack Obama. They ignore all the lessons of nature and history and try to push the world toward their little models and ideas. they should learn
from the great and obvious historical models out there:

1. The abject failure of communism/socialism/big government controls which proved out from the period of 1917 till 1990. Putin knows this because he lived it. Obama thinks he is better than nature and history.

2. The failure of any government to stop a recession by adding in lots of pork for the common man. This failed in South America and Japan (yes, Japan) and led to about a decade of problems in Japan. Obama thinks he knows better.

3. FDR himself is calculated to have extended the depression 10 full years (till the advent of World War II) while he saddled the real producers (people making lots of money and creating jobs) with onerous taxes to
support his worthless work programs.

In general, I can't stand liberals because they really believe that they are smarter than you and me and, in fact, smarter than God, since they can ignore basic natural laws and go with their own ideas. For example, Gore would prefer to cripple all world economies for his half-baked idea that carbon dioxide, a veritable trace gas far less than 1 percent of the atmosphere, is causing the Earth to warm.

The Earth may indeed be warming as a rough trend but not because of that. The charts that Gore shows demonstrating positive correlation between temperature and carbon dioxide are flat out folly! He shows coincident graphs, but due to the timescale, no one observes that the temperature is actually rising 800 YEARS before the levels go up!

Also, the primary greenhouse gas is water vapor. The amount of water very directly influences the temperature and this in turn is influenced by cosmic radiation whose principle cause is THE SUN! The solar sunspot cycle is far more important to warming than anything else. Does Gore offer a solution for THAT?

Indeed, we should stop using fossil fuels mainly to kill the Middle East and totalitarian economies where reserves happen to be. This puts a whole new capitalistic light on it, however, and not the gloom and doom of Algorian priesthood.

Similarly, Obama seemed to be a sort of anti-Bushian messiah. The fact that he is black insured victory. I contend no white guy who talked such socialistic nonsense would ever get in. We did it to assuage our own
historic guilt and distance ourselves from the evil Bush.

He has absolutely no experience except within the context of the Illinois political machine. If you listen carefully to him you will hear absolutely nothing new or interesting.

Is it new to tax and spend and control lots of stuff from a bloated central government? I suggest that was the norm before Ronald Reagan. Here it comes again, then, and "O" says it's new and we all believe him! Why do we believe? Partly it's because we want to and partly because we cannot remember the past or learn from its sad examples.

If you doubt what i say, name ONE socialistic economy which is worth its weight in dung. Sweden? The former Soviet Union? Venezuela? North Korea? Cuba?

Learn from history or be doomed to repeat it.

Hurrah for Putin!

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Billions In Spending AND Cutting The Deficit




President Obama is reportedly preparing to outline a plan to cut the federal deficit in half by the end of his first term.

Now, I admit that I have trouble even balancing my check book. But it seems to me that you can't spend the billions of dollars earmarked for the economic stimulus plan, increase the number of troops in Afghanistan and cut the deficit at the same time.

To understand how staggering this issue is: the deficit on the day Obama took office was more than $1 trillion. By comparison, the deficit when President Clinton took office was $404 billion.

An Associated Press story previewing the president's plan quotes an anonymous official as saying Obama will do this by restoring spending integrity, reducing the troop level in Iraq and by eliminating temporary tax breaks instituted by the Bush administration.

But with companies closing, people losing their jobs, tax revenues reduced, federal stimulus and bailout money being handed out like candy on Halloween, one has to really wonder how the president plans to cut the deficit in half in four years. We should be listening very closely as he unveils his plan to accomplish this in the next several days.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Schwartzenegger Offers To Take Other GOP Gov's Money




Several Republican governors are threatening to reject all or part of the stimulus money earmarked for their states on principle. Because they don't support the program.

But the governor of cash strapped California says, don't worry. He'll be happy to take that money off his fellow Republican governor's hands.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, in an interview with Politico, says if they don't want the millions of dollars in federal government largess, he can use it to stimulate the economy in his state.

Schwarzenegger is, if nothing else, a pragmatist. If you are a governor or a mayor, it doesn't really matter if you believe the stimulus package will reverse the current economic downturn. You need that money to keep your local or state government afloat.

Turning it down on a matter of principle is shooting yourself in the foot. Of course, many of the governors who are threatening to say thanks but no thanks to Washington will, in the end, not only take the money but will try to use their public stance to help launch their runs for the Republican nomination for president. Especially if they are right and the economy hasn't begun recovery until then.

This is the kind of partisan hedge betting that the nation really doesn't need right now. But it should come as no surprise, given the way the vote on the stimulus package pretty much followed party lines.

The veracity of members of Congress who debated and then voted on the bill would have been better had more Democrats voted no and more Republicans yes. But then, I guess the concept of putting country before party, even in times of dire economic crisis, hasn't taken hold on Capitol Hill.

We talk about these issues and more 5 PM weekdays on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/thomashawk/2298695645/

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Climate Change Trumps Human Rights



Secretary of State Hilllary Clinton is in China during her first overseas trip in her new position.

One would think that human rights would be at the top of the agenda. But no. Clinton is focusing on what the Obama administration feels is a more serious topic - climate change. The economic crisis and global security also top the list.

Clinton toured a modern gas-fired energy plant in China to underscore the United States' hope that the two nations will work together to reduce greenhouse gases.

All three issues are, of course, important matters. But human rights should not be automatically taken off the table.

The administration fears that talking about Tibet, for example, would overshadow these other issues. Read: make the Chinese more reticent to work with the U.S. on global warming, the economy and security.

But if the secretary of state of the United States, a secretary of state with the stature, no less, of Hilary Clinton, can't raise the issue of human rights with the Chinese, who can?

Avoiding the topic altogether squanders this opportunity to at least get a dialogue going. Who knows? Perhaps Clinton can persuade Beijing to do something about human rights. Stranger things have happened. And as the saying goes; nothing ventured, nothing gained.


We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Friday, February 20, 2009

Subway Searches And Netanyahu

The alleged racial and ethnic profiling of subway riders to be searched in New York City and the probability that Benjamin Netanyahu will be the next prime minister of Israel were the main topics on today's News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

The first half of the show was about a lawsuit filed on behalf of a man whose parents are from south Asia by the New York Civil Liberties Union. The suit alleges that he was profiled and searched 21 times since police began random searches of subway passengers in 2005. The police deny they racially profile.

Cassandra in the United Kingdom says there's too much sensitivity about this issue. "Political correctness," she says, "has gone absolutely berserk. Terrorism is a reality." The searches, she argues, are a "very small price to pay."

Boaz in California wants to know why the ACLU hasn't spoken out on terrorism. The organization, he says, was formed to protect the Constitution. Isn't terrorism, he asks, against the Constitution?

Adele in Texas says she too has been stopped for additional searches before "every single flight I have taken since September 11, 2001" and is isn't offended. "I'd like to know exactly what injuries he's suffered," she asks, "except maybe his feeling's hurt."

But Silvia in Argentina says it's important to be careful to not discriminate when protecting passengers from terrorism. She wants to know how many guilty people or terrorists have been caught through profiling subway passengers.

Sylvia in New York, however, welcomes the searches. "It would be my pleasure," she says, "to have a policeman search me."

Lively from Chicago put her husband on the microphone to talk about his experiences being searched before boarding a plane in Israel. The security there, he says, made him feel "pretty safe to be in that country."

On the issue of Netanyahu being given the go-ahead to try to form a coalition government in Israel, several people commented.

Gary from South Carolina says Netanyahu's tough stance toward terrorists will serve Israel well. "How many rockets are acceptable?" he asked. "Any idiot," he said, answering his own question, "knows that the answer is zero." He says that if Israel eliminates Hamas as Netanyahu wishes, it will be "doing the rest of us a favor."

But Ramin from the UK wonders how tough Netanyahu would truly be with Israel's enemies. "Netanyahu was in power before," he says. "About Iran, he did nothing."




Credit Where Credit Isn’t Due



Lance - for it after
voting 'nay'

By Alan Jasie

Political correspondent

Washington pols never cease to amaze me. As you all know, not a single Republican member of the House voted for the stimulus bill, yet that hasn’t stopped some of them from telling their constituents otherwise. In a press release today, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has released the names and a few quotes to the voters back home highlighting the hypocrisy of at least seven of these GOP reps taking credit for something they voted against.

The following is an excerpt from the DCCC’s press release.

House Republicans Hypocrisy Hall of Fame

House Republicans Voted Against the Economic Recovery Bill in DC, Praise It at Home

  • Representative Pete Hoekstra (MI-02) - "If you know of someone thinking of buying first home, now may be the time. Stimulus incentive is very generous! Up to 8k! Check it out." [Representative Pete Hoekstra's Twitter page; 2/18/09]
  • Representative Leonard Lance (NJ-07) - "Officials are hoping more federal money will soon be flowing to the Green Brook Flood Control Project. Under the terms of the stimulus plan signed into law Tuesday by President Barack Obama, infrastructure projects that are "shovel-ready" could be the first to be funded with economic recovery money. That's the hope of Rep. Leonard Lance, R-Clinton Township...' This is a classic example of a ‘shovel-ready' project,' Lance said after the tour." [mycentraljersey.com; 2/17/09]
  • Representative Greg Walden (OR-02) - "I figure my job is to try and do whatever I can to clear the hurdles and get the projects going and the people back to work using these funds." [Mail Tribune; 2/19/09]
  • Representative Blaine Luetkemeyer (MO-09) - "Luetkemeyer said the project is considered ‘shovel ready' and that's what the economy needs. President Darrell Krueger and Luetkemeyer discussed the educational benefits of the economic stimulus package." [KTVO-TV, 2/16/09]
  • Representative Don Young (AK-AL) - "Alaskan Congressman Don Young won a victory for the Alaska Native contracting program and other Alaska small business owners last night in H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act." [Congressman Don Young's Press Release; 2/13/09]
  • Representative Ken Calvert (CA-44) - "All of us in the Inland Empire will do what we can to direct as much money as we can." [The Press Enterprise; 2/13/09]
  • Representative John Mica (FL-07) - "I applaud President Obama's recognition that high-speed rail should be part of America's future." [Congressman John Mica Press Release; 2/13/09]

The last time we saw such hubris was when Sen. John McCain during his run for the presidency was lauded for his work on behalf of the vets by President Bush at the signing of the GI Bill even though McCain opposed it.

If they keep this stuff up they should lose the elephant as the party symbol and change it to a bull!

We talk about these issues and more every weekday at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Unsafe Nuke Plants



Indian Point


Nuclear plants that are operating in the United States today are vulnerable to attack by jet planes crashing into their reactors.

That alarm is being sounded by Harvey Wasserman, editor of www.NukeFree.org.

Wasserman says, while the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued regulations requiring the builders of new nuclear reactors to explain how their plants might withstand the crash of large commercial jetliners, they've exempted the 104 reactors licensed to operate now.

"Jets hitting any of them," Wasserman writes, "could kill untold thousands of us and render entire regions of our nation permanently uninhabitable."

Wasserman says the scenario he paints is not out of the question. He says the first jet to crash into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 flew directly over two operating reactors at Indian Point, just 45 miles up the Hudson River. Terrorist Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has acknowledged that reactors were originally targeted but they changed their minds "for the moment."

The NRC's Neil Sheehan, Wasserman reports, has also acknowledged that there's been no analysis of what would happen if a 767 crashed into a reactor.

Wasserman also notes that, on some nuclear reactor sites, spent fuel rods are stored in a fashion vulnerable to an even small-scale attack.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/tonythemisfit/2755502911/


Bibi's Back




Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has been given the go-ahead by President Shimon Peres to put together a coalition government.

Peres gave Netanyahu the nod even though Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's more centrist Kadimah Party received one more seat in the Knesset than did Netanyahu's Likud.

Peres believes Netanyahu, who received a key endorsement from a right wing party yesterday, is better positioned to put together a coalition than is Livni.

Kadimah is electing to remain outside of the new government, which must be formed in the next 42 days. But Netanyahu may keep some cabinent positions open to give Kadimah an opportunity to join the government in the future.

Netanyahu's hawkish stance toward Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran is attractive to many Israelis who are tired of trading land for peace but receiving missile attacks instead. But the new government may be an additional frustration to President Obama and others who are hoping to broker a Middle East peace.

Netanyahu, who was educated in the United States, has complete command of the English language and comes across here more like an American than an Israeli politician. Because he is so well-spoken he is a favorite on the speaking circuit and of cable news shows.

But his Israeli support comes from his hard-lined attitude toward terrorists and others who threaten the existence of his nation. During his previous stint as prime minister, Netanyahu championed the establishment of a West Bank Jewish settlement, something the United States felt undermined the fledgling Middle East peace process.

Yet there are those who believe that peace can only be achieved through a strong Israel that is unafraid to take military action when necessary against its enemies. They argue that negotiations that lead to concessions is viewed as a sign of weakness by the Palestinians.

We talk about these issues and more at 5 PM New York time weekdays on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Lawsuit Alleges Racial Profiling At Subway Checkpoints




The New York Civil Liberties Union has filed a federal lawsuit on behalf of a Brooklyn hospital manager who it says has been the repeated victim of racial profiling at NYPD subway bag search checkpoints.

Jangir Sultan, a 32-year-old native New Yorker whose parents are both from Kashmir says he has been stopped and searched by police officers three dozen times times since the NYPD initiated the subway checkpoint program in 2005. The suit alleges that Sultan’s South Asian appearance is the only factor that can explain this persistent targeting by police officers.

“The NYPD’s racial profiling has disrupted Mr. Sultan’s life making every subway trip a source of anxiety,” said Donna Lieberman , NYCLU executive director. “The NYPD must be held accountable for repeatedly singling out an innocent, hardworking young man for humiliating bag searches. Sadly, his experience is not surprising. The subway bag search program purports to be random but it is set up to invite police officers to engage in racial discrimination.”

The issue of profiling people at security checkpoints is a hot topic in the United States. Civil libertarians insist that security checkpoint checks should be random to avoid discrimination. But some security experts, like former NYPD police officer Gary Moskowitz, argue that police should always profile in their quest to stop criminal activity.

For example, to take it to the absurd, if a green obese tall woman robs a bank, why would police stop short purple thin men and question them?

Moskowitz says the profiling shouldn't be based solely on physical appearance but should also take into account a person's demeanor. The Israelis, with whom he has consulted, have been very successful in their profiling of potential terrorists.

The police department denies it profiles subway passengers. It says searches of bags are conducted at random intervals prescribed by a supervisor on the scene.

The lawsuit maintains that Sultan’s constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments were violated and names the NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly and the city of New York as defendants.

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kenstein/42270793/

Thursday, February 19, 2009

A New Focus On Homelessness




The rising numbers of homeless people in the United States, and the numbers of middle class people who are finding themselves without homes, is both a tragedy and an opportunity to educate the public about the problem and, hopefully address it.

That's the opinion of Shannon Moriarty, who writes about homelessness for Change.org. She was my guest today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

"When you have middle class people falling into this ... it gets everyone talking about it," Moriarty says.

"We have," she says, "a crisis on our hands."

Moriarty says society generally tends to blame poor people for falling into the homelessness trap. But with more middle class people becoming homeless, that view is starting to change.

She says the flip side of this problem is that people who never before had to use society's safety net are clueless about where to get help.

"People who have never been poor before ... don't even know where to start."

Moriarty says the changing face of homelessness also includes whole families including, she says, "millions of children" and many returning combat veterans.

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/68593573@N00/322639083/




Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Obama's Mortgage Plan Isn't Enough



Muhammad


President Obama's plan to stimulate the housing market is a good one. But the $75 billion earmarked is not nearly enough money to make a dent.

That, at least, is the opinion of Dedrick Muhammad, my guest today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

Muhammad, senior organizer and research associate for the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies says the mortgage relief program "will help soften the impact" of the recession. But, he adds, "I don't believe it will stabilize the housing market."

Several callers expressed concern that the plan seems to address, mainly, the middle class. What, they asked, of poor homeowners?

Muhammad says, the reality is, with the exception of rural areas, most poor people are renters.

He particularly likes the portion of the plan which gives bounties to people who arrange loans between borrowers and lending institutions. "They are giving a profit motive," he says, "to restructure an affordable loan."




Obama's Mortgage Bailout Plan Topic On Paltalk




President Obama traveled to Arizona today, where there is an extreme housing crisis, to outline his $75 billion mortgage bailout plan. Designed to get Americans out from under upside down mortgages and to get the real estate market, whose downturn stalled the rest of the economy, back on track. The administration hopes to help up to 9 million mortgage holders with the plan.

In remarks prepared for today's announcement, Obama lamented that the American Dream is being "tested by a home mortgage crisis that not only threatens the stability of our economy but also the stability of families and neighborhoods."

Homeowners who are faced with an inability to pay their mortgages, the president says, are stuck, because they can't sell their homes and downsize to one more affordable.

"You can't afford to leave and you can't afford to stay," he said, stating the obvious.

Obama chose Arizona to announce his plan because there are some 150,000 foreclosures in the Grand Canyon state.

One of the most innovative aspects of the plan is an incentive to mortgage servicers - the middlemen and women between the borrower and the financial institution. They would be given a bounty of $1,000 for each mortgage modification. If the borrower makes all of his or her payments, the servicers would get an additional $1,000 for the first three years of the mortgage.

That alone is enough to make many unemployed or underemployed Americans start thinking about getting into the mortgage servicing business.

The plan also calls for a change to the bankruptcy laws. Giving bankruptcy judges the option to modify mortgages.

And it offers money to help those who are falling behind in their payments to catch up.

We'll discuss the president's plan at 5 PM New York time today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com. To join in the conversation CLICK HERE.

Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users.

News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to an additional 12 million households.

--

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/respres/2539334956/

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Israel Sabotages Iran's Nuclear Program

The Daily Telegraph in the UK is reporting today that Israel has been sabotaging Iran's nuclear weapons program.

While he says he can't, under his nation's laws, report everything he learns, Israeli investigative reporter Ronen Bergman says this report should come as no secret to the Iranians nor the Israelis.

Bergman, author of The Secret War With Iran: The 30-Year Clandestine Struggle Against The World's Most Dangerous Terrorist Power, was my guest today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com.

Bergman says the current head of the Mossad has focused entirely on Iran's nuclear threat. He says planes have malfunctioned and fallen mysteriously from the sky, Iranian nuclear scientists have disappeared and their labs have caught on fire, computers being used to calculate ingredients to develop The Bomb have crashed from unknown causes and nuclear centrifuge accelerators have failed to function.

Bergman favors President Obama's plans to talk to Iranian officials unconditionally - if that leads to a stand down on Tehran's nuclear weapons program and an end to the exportation of terrorism around the world. But he says there's a race on today. Between bringing the regime down and its plans to develop a nuclear weapon. If the Iranian government wins that race and develops a nuclear bomb, Bergman says removing the regime from power will become an even more daunting task.




Monday, February 16, 2009

Universal Health Care On The Way

Dr. Davis Liu, author of the book Stay Healthy, Live Longer, Spend Wisely believes universal health care, where all Americans are guaranteed treatment, is on the way.

But Liu, my guest today on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com, says it will be year's in the making. And he says it will likely be a hybrid system, private-public, rather than one run by the government, which would, he argues, be unwise.

"Americans want everyone covered," Liu says. "The question is, what will it look like?"

Liu says the money is there to ensure coverage for all.

"We spend more than any other nation in the world per capita (on health care)," he said.

He says the problem is a critical one. Because some 47 million people in the United States lack health care.




El Presidente For Life?



Like New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez wanted to eliminate a term limit that would have kept him from running for office again.

Yesterday, a national referendum eliminating the term limits was passed. Clearing the way for Chavez to seek what he really wants: the office of the president for life.

The measure deeply divided Venezuela. There is a lot of discontent over the economy there. Now that oil prices, which drive the nation's economy, are down.

But Chavez had an ace up his sleeve during the election. He used state funds to push for passage of the referendum.

He must now stand for re-election in 2012. But with the help of his incumbency, he may just be successful again.

Chavez was one of George W. Bush's boogie men over the past eight years. This presented Chavez with the foil he needed to coalesce national unity over a target. But with Bush gone, Chavez needs to find new perceived enemies for his countrymen and women to rally around.

--

We talk about these issues and more weekdays at 5 PM New York time on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com

Sunday, February 15, 2009

100-Thousand With Children Who Are U.S. Citizens Deported




The other day we discussed on News Talk Online on Paltalk.com the housing of women and children in an immigrant detention facility outside of Austin, TX.

Now comes word that some 100,000 illegal immigrants who have children who are U.S. citizens have been deported to their home countries over a 10-year period.

In some cases the deportees were convicted criminals. Some may have had more than one child who is a U.S. citizen. And there's a chance that some deportees with children who are U.S. citizens were not included in this count.

The Homeland Security Department says some of the deportees took their children with them. But some of them left their children behind in the United States.

Those who are in this country illegally and who commit criminal acts should, of course, be sent back to their home countries after serving time for the crime they committed. But what about those who have children who were born in the United States but were sent back only because they were undocumented immigrants? Given the number of undocumented immigrants in the United States, and given proposals by both the Republicans and the Democrats to grant some kind of amnesty, shouldn't those who have children who are U.S. citizens be fast-tracked to citizenship?

These families are faced with two prospects. Either go back to their home countries with their children who, under the law, should enjoy all the rights, responsibilities and privileges of U.S. citizenship. Or divide the families.

Neither option is particularly palatable.

It's unfashionable, now, in a time of high unemployment, to be sympathetic to the plight of illegal aliens. But some kind of special consideration should be given in the case of those who have children who are U.S. citizens.