Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Coco and me

The other day Coco, you know, Ice T's wife, came by the Paltalk studios to be interviewed by Diana Falzone - our inaugural Egotastic! chat (Egotastic! is a great online mens magazine www.egotastic.com).

After the interview Coco was gratuitous enough to pose with me. Eat your heart out Harlem!


Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Congress can balance the budget by cutting its own pay


By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network
I know this is just symbolic - but - I'd like to go on the record as agreeing with my fellow Americans who say that the first step toward a balanced budget is a cut in congressional salaries.
Perhaps the question is a bit unfair and a tad leading. It's like asking Americans if they like ice cream. Who in their right mind would say "no?"
If you ask the American people if the salaries of members of Congress should be cut as a way of helping balance the budget - you'd be equally hard-pressed to find anyone who wouldn't agree.
And that's just what the Rasmussen poll found.
Seventy-five percent of those surveyed say Congress should take a salary cut until the budget is balanced.
Seems like a great incentive to balance the budget. You want your $174,000 a year? Balance the budget.
Of course, the likelihood that members of Congress would vote themselves a salary cut is null. But it's really all a moot point anyway. With the throw the bums out mentality sweeping the nation, many members of Congress are going to lose that salary completely during the mid-term elections this November.
Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Monday, August 30, 2010

It's a good time to be a Republican congressional candidate

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

If I were a candidate for Congress this year, I'd hope to be a Republican.

It's pretty obvious that there are going to be wholesale changes in Congress during the midterm elections. Which means the party's about over for the Democrats who now control the Congress and the White House.

A new Gallup poll shows an unprecedented 10 point GOP lead over the Democrats in a generic ballot.

Republicans lead by 51 percent to 41 percent - not only the largest lead so far this year - but the widest margin since Gallup began tracking the midterm generic ballot for Congress.

I'll leave it to others to analyze the reasons why the voters have turned their backs on the Democratic Party. I'm sure there will be a multitude of suggested reasons offered by the pundits - some of them may even be close to the truth.

There are those who are already predicting that this obvious shift in voter sentiment suggests that Barack Obama will be a one-term president.

Maybe so, but this shift came in less than two years. Which means another one - in the other direction - could come in the following two.

But if you juxtapose this poll next to the Glenn Beck rally - which arguably drew 300,000 to a half-a-million people to the National Mall - and it's pretty obvious there are a lot of people who feel disaffected in the United State these days.

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Friday, August 27, 2010

Paterson sticks foot in mouth over 'Ground Zero mosque'

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

NEW YORK - New York's beleaguered governor, David Paterson, has done it again. This time mischaracterizing Muslims in his comments about a proposed Islamic center near Ground Zero.

Paterson, in an apparent attempt to allay the fears of those who maintain the center would be a hotbed of terrorism, called its backers "Sufi Muslims."

"This is not like the Shiites," Paterson continued.

"They're almost like a hybrid, almost westernized. They are not really what I would classify in the sort of mainland Muslim practice."

Which, of course, implies, that "mainland Muslims" are not westernized and are to be feared.

Not surprisingly, this latest gaff by Paterson, has drawn the ire of Muslims.

Among those chiming in are the folks at the New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, who diplomatically called Paterson "grossly misinformed."

"Governor Paterson's comments are grossly misinformed and will be used to support the false notion that mainstream Muslims are somehow incapable of being productive citizens," said CAIR-NY's Community Affairs Director Faiza N. Ali.

You think?

"Responsible leaders should refrain from mainstreaming misinformation about Islam and instead reach out to the Muslim community and its leaders. Of particular concern is the governor's derogatory description of Shia Muslims."

Ali wants Paterson to meet with representatives of New York's Muslim community to discuss and find ways of quelling the anti-Muslim rhetoric that the proposed community center is engendering.

Maybe she should wait until Paterson is out of office and someone who people actually respect as governor takes over before holding such a meeting.

This latest misstep comes as Paterson is being accused of having misled investigators over his acceptance of World Series tickets last year.

It also comes at a time when Paterson predicted "violence and death" because he's ordering the collection of sales taxes for cigarettes sold on Indian reservations to non-Indians.

Paterson, who was lieutenant governor, became governor in 2008 when the incumbent, Eliot Spitzer, resigned over a sex scandal involving a prostitute. One day after he was sworn in, he and his wife both acknowledged having had extramarital affairs.

Fortunately for New Yorkers, Paterson will not be governor for much longer. He was planning to run as an incumbent, but dropped out of the race after it was revealed that he may have tried to use State Police troopers to try to convince a woman to drop a domestic abuse charge against one of his aides. Although he dropped out of the election, he has claimed no wrongdoing and he has resisted calls to resign.

The election is this year, which means Paterson will be governor for just four more months. But two questions remain. Can the Muslims - and everyone else in New York - manage to wait for a new governor to be sworn in? And can Paterson keep his mouth shut until then?

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


A sure sign Karzai is in trouble


By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network
Afghan President Hamid Karzai says the announced timetable for U.S. withdrawal is, in essence,strengthening the Taliban. A sure sign that he is worrying about the mortality of his government.
His words translate into this:
What will I do when the Americans leave? If not for the American presence I'd not be in power today. When they go I'm done.
What he should be doing now is looking for an exit strategy. I.e. a country that will take him in when this is all over. Because if he remains in Afghanistan after U.S. troops depart, he is done. Literally.
If I were Karzai I'd take all that money collected through government corruption and send it offshore. In fact, if he hasn't done that already, I'd be really surprised.
If Karzai is right - that when the U.S. leaves the Taliban will move in to fill the void - then one has to ask, what the hell are we doing in Afghanistan?
Like President George W. Bush - who went into Iraq to find WMDs and then when he couldn't he changed the mission and stayed - President Obama has changed the mission in Afghanistan.
The war he inherited - but the one he said was just because its mission was to get those responsible for the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, has nothing to do with Osama bin Laden and his cronies. Not anymore and perhaps not ever.
As with George W. Bush's war, the mission of Obama's has changed.
The United States is "nation building." Propping up one corrupt government as a better alternative for another more repressive regime waiting in the wings. But is this a good use of the U.S. military?
Surely not, if the mission fails. And Karzai is signaling that when the troops withdraw - the mission will - in fact - be an official failure. Because, more than likely, his government will collapse. The few gains in human rights for women and children will be erased.
If this analysis is correct (and I acknowledge not everyone will agree with it) then what is, as George H.W. Bush might say, the prudent thing to do? Remaining in Afghanistan - staving off the inevitable while losing more American lives - doesn't sound too prudent to me.
And where is the anti-war movement, so vocal when W. was in office?
Largely silent - because - of course - a Democrat is commander-in-chief. And we wouldn't want to do or say anything too damaging to Obama, would we? That might weaken him and lead to a loss of the White House in 2012.
Which, in the view of the Democratic Party faithful, would be a far greater failure than the loss of Kabul to the Taliban.

U.S. Army photo
Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Anti-Muslim attacks in wake of 'Ground Zero mosque' controversy


Al-Iman mosque

NEW YORK - The desecration of a Queens mosque during Wednesday evening prayers is just the latest attack on Muslims or Islamic institutions. And at least some of them can be linked to the so-called Ground Zero mosque controversy.
Police say a drunken man entered the al-Iman mosque on Steinway Street in Queens, shouted anti-Muslim slurs, called the congregation terrorists and then urinated on a prayer rug.
This comes in the wake of an attack on a Muslim cab driver here.
The back of the driver's neck was slit by a passenger after he says the fare asked him if he was Muslim. When he said yes, the driver says, he was knifed.
Police are treating this incident as a bias crime - one that they say may be a reaction to the proposed Islamic cultural center near Ground Zero.
Also, recently, a mosque in California was vandalized and signs protesting the center were left behind.
The Council on American Islamic Relations is calling on political leaders to step up and condemn the attacks.
"Without a significant response by mainstream political leaders, this disturbing trend will only continue to grow," said CAIR-NY Community Affairs Director Faiza N. Ali. "We ask that this incident be treated as a hate crime and that relevant charges be brought against the alleged perpetrator."

CUNY photo
Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Iraqis have more faith in their government than the U.S.


VA National Guardsmen return home

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network
There's no doubt that the Iraqi political system is in turmoil. But Iraqis would rather have uncertain domestic control than be told by the United States how to run their government.
That's the conclusion of a new Gallup poll which surveyed Iraqis.
It finds that Iraqi confidence in their leadership is rising. While their approval of U.S. leadership is falling.
Imagine that. Iraqis wanting to control their own destinies. And resenting being told what to do by an invading force!
The thing is, they are not alone in this opinion. Gallup conducted another poll, of Americans. That poll finds that Americans overwhelmingly do NOT want U.S. troops renewing combat missions in Iraq - even if Iraqi forces are unable to maintain security.
Common ground can now be found between the Iraqi and American people. Let's hope that Washington is listening to them both.

Photo: Staff Sgt. Terra C. Gatti, Virginia Guard Public Affairs

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Biden: Recovery Act working

WASHINGTON – Vice President Joe Biden today unveiled a new report, “The Recovery Act: Transforming the American Economy through Innovation,” which finds that the Recovery Act’s $100 billion investment in innovation is not only transforming the economy and creating new jobs, but helping accelerate significant advances in science and technology that cut costs for consumers, save lives and help keep America competitive in the 21st century economy.

“From the beginning, we have been a nation of discovery and innovation – and today we continue in that tradition as Recovery Act investments pave the way for game-changing breakthroughs in transportation, energy and medical research,” Biden said. “We’re planting the seeds of innovation, but private companies and the nation’s top researchers are helping them grow, launching entire new industries, transforming our economy and creating hundreds of thousands of new jobs in the process.”

According to this new analysis, the U.S. is now on-track to achieve four major innovation breakthroughs thanks to Recovery Act investments:

- Cutting the cost of solar power in half by 2015, putting it on par with the cost of retail electricity from the grid.

- Cutting the cost of batteries for electric vehicles by 70 percent between 2009 and 2015, putting the lifetime cost of an electric vehicle on-par with that of its non-electric counterpart.

- Doubling U.S. renewable energy generation capacity and U.S. renewable manufacturing capacity by 2012, a breakthrough that would not be possible without the Recovery Act.

- Bringing the cost of a personal human genome map to under $1,000 in five years, allowing researchers to sequence 50 human genomes for the same cost as sequencing just one today.

Overall, the Recovery Act is investing $100 billion in science, technology and innovation projects across the country ranging from building a nationwide smart energy grid and health information technology infrastructure to growing the emerging electric vehicle industry, expanding broadband access and laying the groundwork for a nationwide high speed rail system, the report says.

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Consumer confidence down

While they may be seeing an upswing in business - many businesses are still showing hesitancy to rehire people laid during the recent economic downswing. Perhaps one reason is the lack of consumer confidence in the United States.

The latest Gallup poll shows that consumer confidence in the United States remains weak.

Although confidence improved slightly the beginning of the month, it has slipped to -33 over the past two weeks. Gallup says this mirrors July's average - which were the lowest of the year thus far.

Consumer confidence is taking a similar slide in the United Kingdom, an indication that the global economic downturn may not have ended yet.


-
Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Monday, August 23, 2010

Obama's weekly rating lowest yet

It's been said that many Democratic congressional candidates appreciate President Obama coming into address fund raisers with well heeled party faithful ready to dish out moola for their campaigns. But they don't want him publicly stumping for them.

And for good reason.

The latest Gallup poll gives Obama the lowest weekly job approval rating yet. And it comes on the heels of the previous week's poll which was already his record low.

The 43 percent approval rating given the president is 1 percent lower than the previous week.

That's his job approval rating. The number of Americans who say they disapprove of his job performance is now at 50 percent - a new weekly high.

White House photo: Lawrence Jackson

Wishing Hillary were president

In politics, perceptions sometimes trump realities. That may be the case in comparing President Obama with his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, a woman who he successfully battled for the Democratic nomination for president.

A new Rasmussen poll concludes that 48 percent of Americans believe Obama's views are "extreme." While 51 percent believe Clinton to be "mainstream."

"I hated Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton's candidacy scared the hell out of me," says one staunch Republican.

"But what I would give to have Bill as president again. And how I wish, if it was inevitable that the Democrats won that election, that Hillary had been their candidate."

Obama is not the only likely 2012 presidential candidate whose views are seen as extreme by American voters. The Rasmussen poll found that even more people - 55 percent - view former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin's views as extreme.

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


When it comes to the Ground Zero mosque the real enemy is in the mirror



By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network
It was the cartoon character Pogo who said it best. "We have met the enemy and he is us."
Clearly that is the case when it comes to the proposed Muslim cultural center near Ground Zero. And the video above is a graphic case in point.
On Sunday there were two, competing demonstrations at the site where a controversial Islamic cultural center is planned two blocks from the World Trade Center site.
At one point, an onlooker was mistaken for being a Muslim and was harassed by some center opponents.
To their credit, protest leaders stepped between the most threatening of the harassers and the man and then led him to safety. But the confrontation really underscores how all the rhetoric about the so-called Ground Zero mosque - which would neither be on Ground Zero nor which actually is a mosque - has pitted us against one another.
When you have political pundits and even elected officials inferring tenuous links between the center and terrorism you have put together a mixture that - if sparked - could explode.
The man in this video is not Muslim. Not that it matters. I mean, what if he were? Then would the harassment have been appropriate?
It just shows how quick we are to turn on one another over this issue of terrorism.
The people who attacked on September 11, 2001 are intolerant individuals who have no patience for people who don't follow their religious and political ideology. Apparently, at least some of the protesters are also intolerant people, who likewise have no patience for those who don't follow their religious and political ideology.
Of course, many who oppose the Islamic center so close to Ground Zero would bristle at the suggestion that the intolerant man in the hard hat in this video is representative of them. Much as most Muslims bristle at the suggestion that the 9/11 terrorists represent them.
Meanwhile, some real terrorists are sitting in a cave somewhere along the Afghan-Pakistani border watching this video as well smiling at what they've accomplished. Turning American against American.
So who is the real enemy here? Maybe Pogo had a point.

Public's perception of U.S. auto industry rebounds

Back when the government first started talking about bailing out the auto industry, an economically battle weary American public's perceptions of U.S. automakers dipped.

But a new Gallup poll finds those perceptions are on the rebound. In fact, there's been a 15-point increase in the public's perception of the domestic auto industry - the largest one-year leap since Gallup began tracking public opinion on major U.S. industries a decade ago.

For the first time in three years, more Americans have positive than negative perceptions of the U.S. auto industry. But those positive feelings still lag behind those of 2001-2005.

Photo: Joseph Stevenson under Creative Commons license

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Sunday, August 22, 2010

Most Americans would back an Israeli attack on Iran


By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network
Perhaps it has something to do with the fears Americans have of a nuclear armed Iran. But a recent Rasmussen poll concludes that 51 percent of Americans believe the USA should help Israel if it attacks Iran.
Now, there are those who say Iran really can't turn uranium into bombs all that easily. There are others who say, Israel has nuclear arms, why not Iran?
There are others who believe that the United States is under the control of the Israelis and is only doing its bidding. Heck, some people even think the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan have to do with Israel.
Others will say, Gary, you should not be reporting this because you're just beating the drum for war.
So let me be clear about my position on this.
I do not favor anyone attacking Iran. For a multitude of reasons.
An attack on Iran would solidify the nation's support behind the regime because there would then be a common enemy.
An attack on Iran would likely mean civilian casualties - no matter how careful the Israelis might be in trying to minimize it.
An attack on Iran could very well result in a response that might spill over - not just into the Middle East - but globally as those with special interests might be forced to take sides unnecessarily pitting other nations against one another.
But imagine the consequence of a nuclear-armed Iran. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty would be basically worthless - at least in the Middle East. Arab nations - distrustful of Iran - would then want the Bomb as well.
And that's the most benign result.
The more serious consequences include Iran making nuclear devices available to its terrorist surrogates. Or attacking Israel directly itself.
Put yourself in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's shoes. I'd say he views this through the same kind of prism that John F. Kennedy viewed the Cuban missile crisis. Russian missiles in Cuba presented a clear and present danger to the United States. Likewise, a nuclear-armed Iran would present the same to Israel.
No, I don't favor an attack on Iran. But, as Tehran continues to move forward with its uranium enrichment program, it may give Israel no other choice. Clearly the Iranian regime knows this. So why is it moving forward?
Perhaps because it helps realize a religious prophecy that transcends what's best for the Iranian people.
I'm convinced that religion was at least a major influence in George W. Bush's decision to attack Iraq. Just as it is a major influence in Tehran's decision to move forward with its uranium enrichment program. Therein lies the problem when religious beliefs dictate civil policy. And why the two should always be separate.
Unfortunately, that's an impossibility in the Islamic Republic of Iran where religious fanatics dictate policy. And that's why, in the end, as much as I oppose it, an attack on Iran may be both inevitable and unavoidable.
CSIS PONI photo
Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Saturday, August 21, 2010

CAIR questions cops questioning of Pakistani couple

A Pakistani couple was held for questioning for hours by cops following a hijack hoax. The Council on Islamic American Relations is looking into the incident to see if this is a case of discriminatory profiling.

U.S. senators renew call for probe into release of Lockerbie bomber


One year after the release of the Lockerbie bomber, New Jersey's U.S. senators are demanding an investigation into why he was let out of prison and permitted to return to Libya and a hero's welcome. 


Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Friday, August 20, 2010

Discriminating against fat people and smokers


It may not be lawful, but if a Gallup poll's results are correct, there are a lot of employers who are rejecting the job applications of obese people and smokers.

The poll concludes that one in four Americans would be less likely to hire a person who smokes. One in five feel the same way about hiring an overweight person.

There may actually be justification in the decision. Who wants one's company's productivity to wane because workers are out taking smoke breaks? Or having to deal with issues of second-hand smoke if workers are permitted to smoke on the job.

And both smokers and obese people are more apt - as a group - to be sick. No business today wants to have to worry about otherwise unnecessary employee sick days.

But the bottom line is this. If you are one of the million of Americans who are out-of-work - stopping smoking and losing weight might give you an edge over another applicant for a job.


Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Rudy, Koch at odds over mosque


By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network



Former New York Mayors Rudy Giuliani and Ed Koch didn't agree on much. Koch even wrote a book about it, Giuliani: Nasty Man. So, I suppose it shouldn't be such a big surprise that they are at odds over the so-called Ground Zero mosque.

Koch backs President Obama's public support of the mosque. He likens it to President George Washington's support of the establishment of a Jewish synagogue in Rhode Island.

Giulani, on the other hand, opposes it - on the grounds that the mosque will spread hatred. He believes the organizers aren't interested in healing - but want to use the mosque as a wedge to divide.

And all along, I thought the post-9/11 war was not a battle with Islam but with terrorists. Apparently, Giuliani doesn't make that distinction.

He's not alone.

Many Americans believe that terrorism is a code word for Islam. "Not every Muslim is a terrorist," they'll say. "But every terrorist is a Muslim."

I guess that whenever a Muslim, then, commits a violent crime, he is a terrorist. When a non-Muslim commits a violent crime, then he is - well - a criminal.

All of this is indicative of a crossroads in society. In a nation, which was founded on the premise of religious freedom, we are making an exception when it comes to the freedoms of Muslims.

Of course, there are counterarguments to this assertion as well. "Islam isn't a religion" is one oft-heard phrase. "Islam is a religion, but it's also a political ideology" is another.

So, does that mean Muslims should be exempted from the constitutional guarantees of religious freedom?

It seems a bit odd to me that Giuliani would argue that the motivation of the mosque's developers is to be divisive. Its imam is involved in interfaith movements in New York City. He has spoken out against terrorism and in favor of interdenominational dialogue. Both Presidents George W. Bush and Obama have used him as an emissary to the Muslim world.

If it were not for this mosque and it's proximity to Ground Zero, he would be the poster boy for how all Muslim leaders should comport themselves. Now, suddenly, he's divisive.

The current New York mayor, Michael Bloomberg, supports the mosque. Were Giuliani still mayor, he would oppose it. And likely use the power of his office to block the legal establishment of a religious institution two blocks from Ground Zero. Sort of like he tried to stop an art exhibition at the Brooklyn Art Museum he found offensive to his religion when he was mayor.

I wonder which approach, Bloomberg's or Giuliani's, would be judged the most divisive.



Ed Koch responds:
Dear Mr. Baumgarten:
You don't have my position exactly right. I believe the Muslim supporters of the mosque are insensitive for going forward on that site. However, they have an absolute Constitutional right to do so, and government should take no measures to impede them. Those opposing the site of the mosque have an absolute right to express their views. Rudy Giuliani supports the Muslims' Constitutional right to build and, at the same time, expresses his opposition to their building on that site. While our language is different in expressing our views, it would be incorrect to describe us as being at odds.
All the best,
Ed Koch


Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Thursday, August 19, 2010

The Afghanistan corruption beat goes on

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

Apparently the demands of the United States that the Karzai administration stamp out corruption in Afghanistan is being ignored by Karzai himself.

The Washington Post is reporting that President Hamid Karzai ordered the early release of a close aide who is at the center of a major corruption investigation.

The aide, Mohammad Zia Salehi, was originally charged with soliciting a bribe. But the Post reports that the investigation has since broadened into a probe of Salehi's allegedly providing luxury cars to Karzai supporters. And even more damning - that he has been in contact with the Taliban.

All this is doing little to raise confidence among U.S. officials that Kabul is serious about confronting corruption.

It also does little to engender the support of a public that's increasingly confused about what the mission really is. There's been virtually no public reporting of any movement on the get Osama bin Laden front. Combine this with reports of increased honor killings in Taliban-controlled areas and the recent killings of 10 medical volunteers and Afghanistan appears even more of a quagmire than before.

U.S. Navy photo: Petty Officer 1st Class Mark O’Donald/Released

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me


Obama supports 9/11 health bill

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

NEW YORK - President Obama is - finally - supporting the Zadroga bill - which would provide health care for 9/11 responders. Funny the timing, isn't it?

After all, his support comes after the bill was defeated and then reintroduced. If he believes this is such a priority, then why didn't he come out for it before?

The answer is pretty clear. He's obviously trying to blunt criticism of his support for the so-called Ground Zero mosque.

It comes just days after he spoke out in favor of the mosque - and was roundly criticized - even by leaders of his own party - for doing so.

Let me digress for just a moment. I actually agree with the president that the developers of the mosque have the right to build it two blocks from Ground Zero. But I think he was an idiot for saying so.

The mosque is a local issue to be decided by New Yorkers. This is like him wading uninvited into the confrontation between a white cop and a black Harvard professor. That action was ill conceived and so was this one.

It only hurt congressional members of his Democratic Party already facing tough re-elections.

So he had to do something to counter the backlash his mosque remarks engendered. What better way than to suddenly wake up and support the Zadroga bill?

Well, Mr. President, you're a little late to the party. And your motivations are suspect. But at least, you're finally doing the right thing and supporting a measure that would ensure health care for those who have and who will become ill because they answered the call to a national disaster.

Now it's time for those members of Congress who turned their backs on these heroes to do the right thing as well.

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

What's all this fuss about a mosque?

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

NEW YORK - There have been a lot of aspersions cast about the funding of the "Ground Zero" mosque - raising questions about whether terrorist organizations will be paying for it.

Both Democratic and Republican leaders are questioning the funding and are calling for transparency. So imagine my surprise this morning when I turned on CNN and watched a report which said that no money has been raised for the mosque.

None.

Which raises the question: why are people - including political leaders - raising the alarm about funding sources?

Perhaps the bigger question is this. Why would the imam, Feisal Abdul Rauf, who preaches against hate and terrorism, who is involved in interfaith groups in New York City, knowingly accept money from terrorist organizations?

The implication is clear.

If terrorist organizations are funding the Cordoba Center, then it must be a front for terrorism.

Images are conjured of London mosques which serve as terrorism fronts - where terrorism is preached from the pulpit.

But, not only are there no indications that Rauf has any connection to terrorism - he's an outspoken opponent.

Yes, some, but not all, of the 9/11 family members object to the mosques proximity - two blocks away - to Ground Zero (there are 9/11 family members on record as supporting the project). But let's take this into context for a second.

Why are there so many other mosque projects being challenged across the United States.

For example, on Staten Island, a former convent at a Roman Catholic Church was to be converted into a mosque. Was - as in past-tense. Now that deal has been halted. Apparently it's OK for Catholics to pray on that property on Staten Island, but not Muslims.

Or is Staten Island in too close proximity to Ground Zero as well?

The reality is, there is an anti-Muslim undercurrent in the United States. There are people who fear Muslims and Islam. But blocking the establishment of mosques is not going to suddenly make all the Muslims in America go away. It's not going to make terrorists or terrorism go away either.

Fortunately not everyone is caught up in this nonsense. The CNN story included an interview with a Christian minister, Bob Chase, who says he knows Rauf, who has been called on by both the Obama and George W. Bush administrations to be part of State Department delegations to Muslim countries.

Chase says, when the fund raising project begins for the mosque, he will participate. I certainly hope, given the irrational argumentation over this mosque, that doesn't lead to Chase being accused of being a supporter of terrorism.

Meanwhile, New York Gov. David Paterson is offering Rauf state land further away from Ground Zero - his way of calming the waters. Well, unless he sells that land at its fair market value, he's offering to use taxpayer's money to fund a religious institution. If anything surrounding this controversy deserves protest - it is this.

Photo: Robert Huffstutter under Creative Commons license

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network

www.paltalk.com/pnn 

Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays

Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten

Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

Congressional candidate on Avi Perry show

Joel Pollak will be Avi Perry's guest at 7 PM New York time Thursday on the Paltalk News Network.

Pollak is running as a Republican for Congress in the Illinois 9th Congressional District against incumbent Democrat Jane Schakowsky. Among the issues Avi will ask Pollak about:


1. The economy, and what should the government's role be in reviving it.
2. Israel and the peace process.
3. How the U.S. can optimize its fight against terrorism
4. Immigration policies
5. Health care

Pollak is a human rights lawyer and author from Skokie. After graduating from Harvard 1999 he spent time in his native South Africa as a community organizer. After 9/11, Joel became involved in working to improve relations between Muslims, Christians and Jews. He lived with a Muslim family for two years and took Arabic classes, all while leading services at a local Orthodox Jewish synagogue. While defending Israel strongly, he also wrote extensively on ideas for reviving the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, publishing articles in the academic and general press.

He earned a law degree from Harvard in 2009 where he also worked as a research assistant for Alan Dershowitz. He also published two books while at law school: The Kasrils Affair (2008) and the recent release Don’t Tell Me Words Don’t Matter: How Rhetoric Won the 2008 Presidential Election (2009). After graduation he worked for the Hudson Institute on a new human rights initiative that seeks to counter the anti-American and anti-Israel efforts of dictatorships at the United Nations.

In April 2009, Pollak rose to national prominence after challenging Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA), asking: “How much, if any, responsibility do you have for the financial crisis?" It was a question few in Washington had dared to ask. Frank lost his temper, but Pollak calmly put the question to him again. The "debate" became a YouTube and TV sensation, and support for Pollak poured in from around the country.

Go to http://www.aviperry.org to talk to Pollak. There is no charge

Just another Penn Station commute


Wednesday afternoon and thousands of New Jersey residents are trying to make their way out of Manhattan and to their homes in the Garden State. But once again, things come to a grinding halt in New York's Penn Station.

I wonder why trains that become disabled always seem to breakdown in the tunnel under the Hudson River bottle necking both inbound and outbound traffic? And why, seemingly, is it always during the afternoon rush?

Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Deafness in Congress



If you've got that sinking feeling that Congress doesn't much care what you think about anything, you're far from alone.

A new Rasmussen poll concludes that 60 percent of American voters feel that most members of Congress don't care what their constituents think.

This does not bode well for incumbents during this year's mid-term elections. Only 37 percent of voters surveyed believe that their local members of Congress deserve re-election.

As members of Congress visit their districts during the August recess - many of them holding town hall meetings - they should talk less and listen more, those surveyed said. Seventy-one percent of the respondents say it's more important for members of Congress to listen to their constituents than it is for them to explain their actions on Capitol Hill.


Photo: Wally Gobetz under Creative Commons license

Gary Baumgarten
Host - News Talk Online
Director of News and Programming Paltalk News Network
www.paltalk.com/pnn
Join the News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network at 5 PM NY time weekdays
Twitter: http://twitter.com/garybaumgarten
Chat with me: http://gary.superim.me

EU pledges more Pakistan flood aid

In response to the ever increasing scale of the humanitarian crisis, the European Union's Humanitarian chief, Kristalina Georgieva, is announcing an additional $30 million in flood relief assistance to Pakistan.

The amount pledged brings to $70 million the EU is providing to flooded areas of Pakistan.

"The flood damage in Pakistan is massive and many millions of people are suffering," Georgieva said.

Meanwhile, Pakistan's chief meteorologist is saying that the flood waters are not expected to recede until the end of the month. Some 1,500 people have died in the flooding.

Should Gulf drilling resume?

pnn

Now that the Deepwater Horizon oil gusher seems to be capped - permanently - the next obvious question is - should the moratorium on Gulf of Mexico drilling be lifted?

There are two obvious competing desires here. On the one hand, there are those who say another environmental disaster would prove the death knoll of the Gulf region, including its economy. On the other hand, the moratorium has suspended the jobs of thousands of people and has stifled a largely oil production dependent economy.

A new Gallup poll reflects those conflicting demands.

It finds that 49 percent of Americans believe drilling should resume in the area of the gusher. Nearly the same number - 46 percent - say no.

This underscores the difficulty in developing good public policy for moving forward with oil exploration. And the need to find ways to - should drilling resume - ensure that safeguards are in place to prevent another disaster like the one sparked by the Deepwater explosion.

On a related matter, the same poll found that 48 percent of Americans disapprove - and 44 percent approve - of the way President Obama handled the Gulf crisis.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Iran moves forward with nuclear program

Ali Akbar Safehi
Ali Akbar Safehi

This move is in defiance of international efforts to avert a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network


Frankly, I get awfully tired of those who claim that Iran really isn't developing nuclear weapons - don't believe it when they say they are, it is argued.

I even get nervous when "experts" say, well, Iran may be developing nuclear weapons but, heck, they are years away from getting it done.

Perhaps, now, they will finally listen. Perhaps, but I'm not holding my breath.

Ali Akbar Safehi, the head of Iran's nuclear program now says they are moving forward with their uranium enrichment program. And that they expect construction of the enrichment site to begin in March.

March. That's seven months, not years, away.

Lest one think that this is much ado about nothing, it would be well worth one's while to remember that:

a) You need to enrich uranium in order to weaponize a nuclear program

and

b) This move is in defiance of international efforts to avert a nuclear arms race in the Middle East.

And remember, this is the first of 10 planned nuclear enrichment facilities in Iran.

Thursday, August 12, 2010

Napolitano switches focus to dog bites



Latest counter-terrorism target?
Latest counter-terrorism target?

The following story isn't entirely true. But maybe it should be.

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

Word that more Americans died from dog bites than from terrorist attacks worldwide in 2009 has reportedly thrown the Homeland Security Department into a panic as it struggles to shift priorities to justify its existance.

"The State Department's report on terrorism last week chronicled 25 deaths of Americans worldwide due to terrorism in 2009," said a breathless, sleepless Homeland Security source who asked to not be identified.

"One website alone, www.dogbite.org, found 32 deaths of Americans during the same period due to dog bites. So we're trying to shift our funding priorities from waterboards to dog sticks."

Dog stick manufacturer stocks soared on the news. A spokesman for the waterboard industry shrugged off the obvious threat on his business, pointing out that the CIA, the military and "two-bit dictators on both the right and left" continue as the bulk of his customer base.

An anonymous spokesman for PETA took an unexpected position when questioned about the Homeland Security shift from interrogating people with Arabic accents to barking canines.

"We're all for it," he said. "It proves what we've said all along. Animals are people too."

--

Photo: puck90 under Creative Commons license

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Punishing a soccer team for losing



By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network

I just hosted a segment about North Korea on News Talk Online on the Paltalk News Network the other day. We talked about their missile program. Their sinking of a South Korean naval ship. Their confiscation of a South Korean fishing vessel.

We investigated their firing of 130 artillery shells into South Korean waters. Their provocative rhetoric. Their relationship with China.

We discussed the ramifications of renewing the war with the North. Would the USA and South Korea succeed? What would that mean to U.S.-Sino relations? How would China react to a possible influx of North Korean refugees should hostilities resume?

But I must admit, I missed the boat over the most provocative and dastardly action of all by the North Korean government: the punishment of their World Cup soccer team for losing.

Fifa, soccer's governing body, is investgating allegations that coach Kim Jong-hun is out of the public eye because he's been sentenced to hard labor. Fifa is also concerned over a report that the players themselves have been subjected to public humiliation.

As if their performance in South Africa wasn't humiliating enough. But I digress.

This all conjures up images of Saddam Hussein's torture chambers for failed Iraqi athletics.

There are many ways to judge the character of a nation and its leaders. The way one responds to the loss of a world championship sporting event, is just one measure.

It may not be as important as North Korea's nuclear program. But it's just as telling.

--

Photo: Candice Lee under Creative Content license

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

How the people of Afghanistan & Pakistan view the 'war on terror'

Afghan children taught by U.S. and Afghan military volunteers
Afghan children taught by U.S. and Afghan military volunteers

By GARY BAUMGARTEN
Paltalk News Network Correspondent


There's not a day that goes by that I don't get a press release from the U.S. military touting successes in its efforts to rid Afghanistan of the terrorists who grip that nation.

These pronouncements are designed to keep American support of the effort high. We may not be getting to Osama bin Laden as intended when we first invaded nine years ago. But, heck. Along with our Afhan and Pakistan partners - we're protecting the people there from Taliban terrorists.

You'd think, then, that the people of those two countries would be eternally grateful for our efforts.

Maybe so. But they aren't too happy with their own government's contribution to the effort.

Most Afghans polled by Gallup feel that both their government - and the Pakistani government - are falling down on the job.

Many Pakistanis surveyed in the poll agree.

And this poll was conducted before the infamous WikiLeaks of documents that show collusion between the Pakistani government and the Taliban.

According to Gallup, 78 percent of Afghans believe the Pakistan government is not doing enough to curb terrorism. A majority of Afghans, 59 percent, also feel the same way about their own government.

The perception on the other side of the border is similar, though not as damning. Forty-four percent of Pakistanis feel the Afghan government is not doing enough. A similar number - 41 percent - feel their own government is falling short on the war on terrorism.

Press releases and public pronouncements about the anti-terrorism efforts along the Afghan-Pakistan border may be enough to appease Americans - for now. But those living in the midst of the action know better.

--

Photo: ISAF